Search
  • Leveraging Biology to Power Engineering Impact
    Get the report
  • NOMINATIONS OPEN! Engineering the Future of Distributed Manufacturing
    Learn More
  • Open Call | Submit your visioning theme idea
    Learn More
NSF Engineering Research
Visioning Alliance
Get involved

Engineering the Future of Distributed Manufacturing

Erva logo mark

Thematic Task Force Role: An ad hoc group of cross sector experts guide content planning to develop a report that will includes actionable findings and identified research directions intended to catalyze action.

Exploratory Domains

The workshop was aimed at developing key insights and major opportunities for academic, industry and government organizations to advance future research priorities in:

  • Materials

  • Tools, Systems, and Processes

  • Data Analytics and Quality Assurance

Learn more about the event: View the agenda and participants.

DOMAIN OVERVIEW

The United States can make engineering research investment decisions to change the current declining manufacturing trajectory. But this effort must focus on our competitive future rather than re-creating the past. As data, connectivity, and smart machines merge the digital and physical worlds, technology creates avenues for U.S. manufacturers to improve their productivity, agility, and competitiveness.
This workshop focused on ideating and articulating the technical challenges for creating products and tools, anywhere, anytime, anyplace in any quantity. This democratization of distributed manufacturing will address sustainable materials feedstock, supply chain, automation, and quality control. Democratization is the act of making something accessible to everyone and will empower our small and medium manufacturers—who vastly outnumber their large counterparts—to operationalize these technological advancements, spurring income growth, new jobs, local investment, and innovation ripple effects across the ecosystem.

Materials

The goal of this breakout was to engineer a distributed materials supply chain. Sustainable materials that are recyclable or with renewable biobased feedstocks combined with distributed manufacturing with reduced transportation and localized supply chains have the potential to reduce the environmental impact of manufacturing. However, manufacturing with a high level of customization, requires materials that can be easily molded, shaped, or cut using a range of different manufacturing processes, such as 3D printing, CNC machining, or injection molding. How can we engineer a local, versatile, materials supply in any quantity accessible for decentralized production? Are there new business models between manufacturers, suppliers, and logistics providers to ensure a reliable and efficient supply chain?

Tools, Systems, & Processes

The goal of this breakout was to envision a future where every product/tool, can be created, anywhere, anytime, and in any lot size. The intersection of machine tools and hard tooling is essential in distributed manufacturing to create custom tooling that can be used with machine tools to produce a wide range of products at high volumes and with high precision. This streamlines mass production. Once hard tooling is in place, the cost per part can be relatively low, and the parts produced can be precise and consistent even with complex shapes or features that are difficult to achieve with other manufacturing processes. However, the initial cost of designing and producing the tooling can be relatively high. How do we create high-quality tools on demand to create a wide range of products, from small components to large structures and machinery?

Data Analytics & Quality Assurance

The goal of this breakout was to articulate engineering innovations to improve efficiency of production process, optimize inventory management, reduce downtime, and improve the quality of products and services. How do we applying data analytics collected from various sources within a manufacturing supply chain that spans multiple locations to make more informed decisions, identify areas for improvement, and optimize their supply chain to increase productivity, reduce costs, and improve customer satisfaction. How do we enable quality and agility in manufacturing?

How do we engineer future systems to monitor and control the quality of products at various stages of the production process, including design, raw material procurement, manufacturing, packaging, and shipping regardless of the lot size. How do we qualify a lot size of one? What new business models shift the focus from mass production to customer-centric production that is needed to gather customer data to design and produce products that meet specific customer needs, as well as implementing customer feedback mechanisms to improve the quality and customization of products over time.

Co-Host

1200px-oak_ridge_national_laboratory_logo-svg

Timeline

  • January 2023
    Established
  • March 2023
    Visioning Event
  • Summer 2023
    View Final Report

Thematic Task Force

Photo 1 for (distributed) angelique johnson

Angelique Johnson

CEO
MEMStim, LLC
Photo 5 for bobby pitts

Bobby Pitts

Senior Technical Program Manager
Google
Photo 9 for charles johnson-bey (distributed)

Charles Johnson-Bey

Senior Vice President
Booz Allen Hamilton
Photo 13 for craig blue

Craig Blue

Defense Manufacturing Program Director - National Security Science Directorate
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Photo 17 for glenn daehn

Glenn Daehn

Director
HAMMER Engineering Research Center
Professor
The Ohio State University
Stay up to date on ERVA's latest news
Subscribe
crossmenuchevron-down